The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Current Events (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   What would Martin Niemoller think about Arizona? (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=22610)

Spexxvet 04-26-2010 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 651705)
Belgium

But they're Belgians
~~~
Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 651705)
France
France has had a national ID card since 1940.

Wasn't France occupied by the Nazis then?
~~~
Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 651705)
Germany

Nazis, what do you expect?
~~~
Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 651705)
Greece

Men are allowed to keep theirs in their boyfriends' rectums.
~~~
Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 651705)
Italy

Because if they didn't have IDs, they'd forget their own names.
~~~
Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 651705)
China

Come on. In China, it's so easy to get lost in the crowd that IDs don't matter. And everybody has the same description - eyes: brown, hair: brown
~~~
Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 651705)
Costa Rica

Who cares?
~~~
Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 651705)
Chile

No, kinda warm.

Do all those countries have national healthcare, too?

TheMercenary 04-26-2010 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spexxvet (Post 651707)
:turd:

Who cares?

jinx 04-26-2010 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JuancoRocks (Post 651674)
"A PERSON IS PRESUMED TO NOT BE AN ALIEN WHO IS
35 UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES IF THE PERSON PROVIDES TO THE LAW...


http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/sb1070h.pdf

.

Ah, ok thanks, that link is really helpful.
The part you quoted starts here though (bold mine).

Quote:

20 B. FOR ANY LAWFUL CONTACT MADE BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR A LAW
21 ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR A LAW
22 ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OF A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF
23 THIS STATE WHERE REASONABLE SUSPICION EXISTS THAT THE PERSON IS AN ALIEN WHO
24 IS UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, A REASONABLE ATTEMPT SHALL BE
25 MADE, WHEN PRACTICABLE, TO DETERMINE THE IMMIGRATION STATUS OF THE PERSON,
26 EXCEPT IF THE DETERMINATION MAY HINDER OR OBSTRUCT AN INVESTIGATION. ANY
27 PERSON WHO IS ARRESTED SHALL HAVE THE PERSON'S IMMIGRATION STATUS DETERMINED
28 BEFORE THE PERSON IS RELEASED. THE PERSON'S IMMIGRATION STATUS SHALL BE
29 VERIFIED WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO 8 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION
30 1373(c). A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY,
31 CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE MAY NOT SOLELY
32 CONSIDER RACE, COLOR OR NATIONAL ORIGIN IN IMPLEMENTING THE REQUIREMENTS OF
33 THIS SUBSECTION EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY THE UNITED STATES OR
34 ARIZONA CONSTITUTION.
So I guess it depends on these 'rules' that they haven't made yet will be the determining factor. And either they will conform with the 4th amendment or they won't, and it will be struck down.

I totally agree with the rest of what I've quoted here but would rather see the law fail than be unconstitutional.

spudcon 04-26-2010 07:08 PM

United States
All citizens are required to have a Social Security card from childhood, and at age 18 all males are required to register with the United States Selective Service.

Cloud 04-26-2010 07:39 PM

but you don't have to carry your government docs with you at all times

Sheldonrs 04-26-2010 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cloud (Post 651689)
have no idea what your point is about this neemroller guy, but I suspect he'd think -- man, it's hot here!

My point is if people other than those targeted by this law don't speak out against it, pretty soon, it won't be long before we get targeted by similar laws and there won't be anyone around to speak out for us.

lumberjim 04-26-2010 08:05 PM

But the spirit of this law is not to invade our privacy, or force us to 'carry papers'. It's to make it easier for Illegal Aliens to be caught. Because they are Illegal. They can't be 'persecuted' like the poem above's author.... they don't have any rights in this country if they are here illegally. Logically speaking, not practically of course.

classicman 04-26-2010 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lumberjim (Post 651767)
Logically speaking, not practically of course.

Therein lies the rub. At least they are doing something. That is more than the the past administrations have done. But again, until we control our own borders nothing will really change.

TheMercenary 04-26-2010 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cloud (Post 651755)
but you don't have to carry your government docs with you at all times

I do. But I do not really support the idea of everyone carrying national ID cards. But I do think all illegals should be registered or deported.

xoxoxoBruce 04-26-2010 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sheldonrs (Post 651766)
My point is if people other than those targeted by this law don't speak out against it, pretty soon, it won't be long before we get targeted by similar laws and there won't be anyone around to speak out for us.

Regardless what happens in this case, that scenario is in the future for everyone in this country. As the world population increases, and with it competition for resources, and the radical Islamic factions get more aggressive, it'll become a necessity.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lumberjim (Post 651767)
...Because they are Illegal. They can't be 'persecuted' like the poem above's author.... they don't have any rights in this country if they are here illegally. Logically speaking, not practically of course.

As soon as they sneak on the American soil, the scumbags have all kinds of constitutional protections.

lumberjim 04-26-2010 11:04 PM

then again....if we adopted the practice of gruesomely amputating the left hand of any captured illegal alien, and sending them home to tell the tale......

TheMercenary 04-26-2010 11:17 PM

A group of well placed munitions would fix the issue and funnel the immigrants.

Happy Monkey 04-27-2010 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lumberjim (Post 651767)
But the spirit of this law is not to invade our privacy, or force us to 'carry papers'.

Not "us", just people worried a cop might think they seem illegal. If you look real legal, you don't need papers.

glatt 04-27-2010 09:24 AM

We're going to the Grand Canyon in August. Does this new law mean we need to travel with our passports to Arizona? I can't find anything anywhere that says what Arizona considers to be proof of citizenship. We're white and speak English well, but it will be summer time and we might all be a little tan by then.

Do we need our passports? If I don't have my passports, and a cop pulls me over for speeding or something, are they legally able to detain us all for a few days while we dig up proof that we are legal?

jinx 04-27-2010 10:07 AM

Driver's license should do it if you get pulled over for speeding glatt. And unless your kids start screaming about you not being their father/parents they shouldn't arouse suspicion...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:37 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.