If it's just for pedestrians they don't need a damn bridge, just a big ass A ladder.
|
Requirements for ladder:
1) Must be huge 2) Must be buoyant 3) Must love foot traffic 4) This is not a step |
Buoyant? No not buoyant... across the water, not in it. :rolleyes:
|
If it's a stepladder, it damn well better be buoyant. You know how people ignore the fact that it's not a step. Ask any civil (or mean) engineer.
|
It doesn't go in the damn water, it goes over it. Buoyancy is not an issue.
|
Eh, be all scientific and shit. It's still a stepladder. Who is calibrating the tensile strength of that thing? Are the calibration devices calibrated, and to what standard?
I think, in the grand scheme, buoyancy is an important safeguard. Think of the children. |
heh heh...
I was silly last night! |
Why not a ferry? That seems like the best solution to me. But what do I know? I'm just a dumbass Marine who loves ferries. Carry on.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Here's a cheaper way to go.
|
Ferry? Hell, build a giant catapult!
ETA: Here it is, the human trebuchet. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mo_oigyFlTA |
Trebuchets are so last millenium, tho', dawg!
|
Quote:
And how did you figure my environmental position, from my statement that $44 million dollars for a bridge that benefits so few people, compared to how many people's tax doll-I mean pounds it took to pay for it is a waste (IMHO)? And, for the record, I don't own a car. So there.:brikwall: |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.