I agree, hanging a mannequin dressed as Sarah Palin is uncool... very uncool.:(

hanging a mannequin - any mannequin is very uncool. man or beast.

http://www.jewishjournal.com/opinion...rton_20081027/

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpoi...orters_inc.php

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540...67382#27367382

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/1..._n_137710.html

http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/analysis/506

Right wing Israeli extremists never called for it. They all but called for the assassination of Rabin - to destroy the Oslo Accords and peace process. They got what they wanted.

Right wing extremists are doing same in America. Implied calls for the murder of Obama are being heard. Rush Limbaugh, et al does not call for it. But a message of hate is heard. Same message that McCain has been forced to confront in his own campaign stops. Federal agents believe this is a second plot recently uncovered.

I wonder how donkeys feel about pinatas.

At some time in the past, I have held that burning an effigy of a famous person is a legitimate (albeit extreme) expression of political opinion. Kind of like burning a flag, a last resort way to express the most extreme anger at something. It can be legitimate, but only if it is justified by the most serious grievances. Say, as part of the overthrowing of a tyranny.

Hanging an effigy seems pretty similar, but the idea of people hanging effigies of Palin and/or Obama seems wrong to me. Partly it's the lynching thing but also I don't feel any candidate or running mate is bad enough to warrant the kind of extreme emotion that is conveyed by the gesture.

I wouldn't even hang in effigy either of the Clintons or either of the Bushes. I might splash holy water on an effigy of Rumsfield, though.



P.S. Girl with the "B" .... back to front ... :smack: :lol: duhhhhh

... like one would with a vampire? :rolleyes:

Even Keith Olbermann lashed out at this guy on his show last night.

Ithink I probably have a slightly different oreintation to effigies than you do. They traditionally play quite a large role in protest here, and our most treasured national tradition involves burning one. When my eldest niece finished primary school, she and her friends and my bro's family had a big celebratory bonfire in their back garden, at which the kids burned an effigy of their most hated teacher, stuffed full with old school notes.

Around Guy Fawkes Night, kids take 'Guys' that they've made, around in a wheelbarrow and ask people for "a penny for the Guy" to gather money for fireworks and sweets. Though it's traditionally meant to be Guy Fawkes, there is also a sub tradition of making the Guy look like an unpopular figure of the day.

I still think there is a vast difference between hanging up a Halloween dummy to look like a politician of the day, and hanging up an effigy of the first black cntender for president. Your country has a recent history of lynching black people: the Palin effigy cannot hold the same cultural resonance (and therefore importance) as hanging the effigy of a black man.


[eta] not that I approve of the Palin dummy. I think it's in poor taste.

Burning an effigy, in an active protest, carries a different connotation than leaving an effigy, hung by anonymous person(s).

David Beckham was hanged in effigy in this country, after he was blamed for England going out of the World Cup in 1998.

I agree with Dana, I would see it differently if it was Obama, for the reasons she has stated. I don't think it's tasteful that it's Palin, I'm just not that into hate, but it doesn't have the same resonance.

Then again I've seen Thatcher masks on guys and not protested. So maybe I am seething underneath.

I see your point SG, but I still think it is a horrible thing to do to anyone - whatever their race, religion, sex....

I completely respect that and think the whole Guy Fawkes thing is pretty cool. We left the UK a week before the celebration the last time we were there and were disapointed that we could not stay on.

Completely true. The point is that there is becoming this blatant duplicity and double standard surrounding protest, visual, or virtual (internet) that is accepted by one group, but if displayed by another the race card is played. That is a problem and will remain a problem for many. I completely and whole heartedly support equality among races and ethnic groups, regardless of who you are and were you came from. I do not support reversal of roles, duplicity, double standards, or assumption of roles of submissiveness in exchange for roles of dominance because of some historical wrong from generations past. I carry no guilt because of some BS that happened over 100 years ago. Never will. As a person of Scottish/Irish decent I could conjure up many historical wrong doings and oppressive acts. That is not something to carry from generation to generation, nor is it something to ingrain into the consciousness of my children or children's children only to keep open old wounds and festering hate. Equality? I am all for it. Something else? No. I have no problem what so ever with a black or half white president.

Over a hundred years ago, Merc? When do you think the last racially motivated lynching was? It isn't even a century since blacks were not considerd full citizens.


[eta] I am not suggesting btw that you are racist. I think your desire for a wiping clean of the account (generationally speaking) and a shared abhorrence of all discrimination in this regard, is laudable; however, you cannot just snap your fingers and say the past holds no currency in our cultural understanding of the world. The oppression of non-whites in America is not ancient history. It is far too recent to expect it not to still hold resonance for people.

This is exactly my fear. Its the reason why effigies of prominent political figures being hung, etc. are so troubling here in the States. We have a very nasty history of presidents and other prominent people being assasinated. We have no Guy Fawkes celebration, but we do have Martin Luther King Day and the Lincoln Memorial. Go figure.

I understand your point. The hundred year comment was about slavery in the US as santioned. I am old enough to remember the race riots of the 60's. I understand the historical significance of it all. I do not, however, believe that I or my family should somehow carry around some bag of guilt for past deeds done by others. We also have a movement to revise history, not the history that has not been told, i.e. history books that omitted bad deeds, those should be revised and the record should be set straigt. But the removal of large conferate statues and memorials to the dead. Now I am not a Southerner by upbringing, but it still bothers me that somehow it is ok to erase evidence of Southern History. I am not talking about the Confederate flag as a component of Southern states flags, because many of those changes ocurred during the 50's at a time of segregation. But to revise history to remove factual historical elements that you disapprove of only to replace them with elements intended to invoke guilt is just wrong. Let us add those elements to balance the picture, not remove one to eliminate the other.