The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Current Events (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   I found out today (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=16679)

xoxoxoBruce 02-21-2008 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw (Post 434060)
American agriculture needs 1.8 million immigrants.

So send the other 16 million home.

tw 02-21-2008 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce (Post 434070)
So send the other 16 million home.

Other American industries need the rest.

TheMercenary 02-21-2008 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw (Post 434066)
Idoit? You want to discuss logically or will you again let your penis talk for you. Words of insult are used by those who have no logical grasp. It asks, "What are you grasping as you write your posts." No wonder your posts contain so much hate. Relax. Stop squeezing it.

Your right. It's not about foreigners. Its about the source of your hate and eyes that overtly ignore why America needs so many illegal immigrants.

It is not about hate idiot. It is about illegals who are busting our bank.

TheMercenary 02-21-2008 11:24 PM

http://static.flickr.com/39/84794196_1ffc979d41.jpg

xoxoxoBruce 02-21-2008 11:24 PM

Other American Industries employ Chinese and Indians.

TheMercenary 02-21-2008 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce (Post 434075)
Other American Industries employ Chinese and Indians.

Yea, in China and India.

tw 02-22-2008 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce (Post 434075)
Other American Industries employ Chinese and Indians.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 434076)
Yea, in China and India.

The term in the Silicon Valley is "ICs". Are they discussing Integrated Circuits? No. IC represent more than 50% of the employees now in the Silicon Valley - Indian and Chinese. But again, TheMercenary posted hate without first learning facts. That is so common among Americans who use derision to somehow blame it all on immigrants and unions and ...

TheMercenary - why do you know so much without first learning the details? Did you learn all this at the last cross burning?

TheMercenary 02-22-2008 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw (Post 434092)
TheMercenary - why do you know so much without first learning the details? Did you learn all this at the last cross burning?

tw, why are you such an Idiot? I know nothing of cross burnings. I am not from the South.

tw 02-22-2008 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMercenary (Post 434095)
tw, why are you such an Idiot? I know nothing of cross burnings. I am not from the South.

Cross your fingers and put a match to them. You might learn something.

DanaC 02-22-2008 06:11 AM

I've always hated that term: illegal alien. It sounds dehumanising. More accurate would be 'illegal immigrant', regardless of what the legalise term might be. Their illegality does not rest in the fact that they are 'aliens', their illegality rests in the fact they have migrated without following the proper channels.

Illegal alien reduces them to their very alienness, the fact that they are foreign.

TheMercenary 02-22-2008 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DanaC (Post 434111)
I've always hated that term: illegal alien. It sounds dehumanising. More accurate would be 'illegal immigrant', regardless of what the legalise term might be. Their illegality does not rest in the fact that they are 'aliens', their illegality rests in the fact they have migrated without following the proper channels.

Illegal alien reduces them to their very alienness, the fact that they are foreign.

Semantics IMHO. It doesn't change the fact they are here illegally, you know, broken our laws.

DanaC 02-22-2008 08:38 AM

Semantics are not unimportant. Words have power. The point is that 'illegal alien' reinforces their otherness rather than their illegality. It reduces them as people to 'aliens'. 'Illegal immigrant' emphasises the illegal act rather than their otherness, it focuses on what they've done rather than what they are.

TheMercenary 02-22-2008 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DanaC (Post 434130)
Semantics are not unimportant. Words have power. The point is that 'illegal alien' reinforces their otherness rather than their illegality. It reduces them as people to 'aliens'. 'Illegal immigrant' emphasises the illegal act rather than their otherness, it focuses on what they've done rather than what they are.

It does not reduce them as people to me and I don't see them as less than human. The focus is on what they have done. Because they are people changes none of that.

DanaC 02-22-2008 08:46 AM

Maybe it's a cultural thing. We don't use the word 'alien' here to refer to incoming foreigners.

elSicomoro 02-22-2008 09:55 AM

Actually, I don't hear "illegal alien" very often...some may use it to make a point. In general, the term here seems to be "illegal immigrant."

Some guy on PhillyBlog accused people that used "illegal alien" of being racist; he's a bit of a nutter. I understand Dana's POV on it, but it's totally different than using a word like "spic."


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.