The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Image of the Day (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   November 11, 2007: Badger badger badger (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=15909)

busterb 11-11-2007 07:20 PM

If they'd had these cows in Mississippi, we wouldn't have had the 55mil. beef plant flap up .
In addition, 90,000 cattle are culled annually due to mastitis, 31,000 due to lameness and 125,000 due to infertility2.

think-floyd 11-11-2007 09:46 PM

Quote:

On 17 August 1998 the Government published the Bourne Report4 and announced its plans for a strategy to control bTB in cattle.
That's it! send Matt Damon in to take out the Tuberculosis Badgers covertly.

DucksNuts 11-12-2007 03:17 AM

OK, thats fake ....right? coz none of them have shadows? ....bite me, I have never called photoshop before.

Oh and....wtf with that badgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadger thingie?

ogwen69 11-12-2007 04:54 AM

I call Photoshop i'm afraid.

IIRC Badgers are pretty territorial, and wouldn't tolerate that many rivals.

I suspect that someone has had a camera on a tripod, and taken lots of images of one badger (and the cat) in the garden over a period of time, then photoshopped.

Anyway, it can't be real, there's no mushroom and no snaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaakes

Sundae 11-12-2007 05:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DucksNuts (Post 406166)
Oh and....wtf with that badgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadger thingie?

Edited - realised UT had in fact linked the badgerbadgerbadger etc
You will pass it on to someone else Ducks. You will. Or it will drive you insane. Them's the rules I'm afriad.

BTW Nikolai, glad to see you're still around! But personally I'd drink the booze and call out for pizza :)

xoxoxoBruce 11-12-2007 06:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DucksNuts (Post 406166)
Oh and....wtf with that badgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadger thingie?

http://www.badgerbadgerbadger.com/

ZenGum 11-12-2007 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ogwen69 (Post 406167)
I call Photoshop i'm afraid.

IIRC Badgers are pretty territorial, and wouldn't tolerate that many rivals.

I suspect that someone has had a camera on a tripod, and taken lots of images of one badger (and the cat) in the garden over a period of time, then photoshopped.

Anyway, it can't be real, there's no mushroom and no snaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaakes

I agree that it is probably photoshopped, but by a different technique - I doubt a badger would hang around that long with flashes going off all the time. I guess they have one photo of a garden at night, and lots of photos of one badger mucking about against a plain (indoor/studio) background, and pasted the badger in appropriately. I've seen a similar one with scores of monkeys in a library.

Yellow #5 11-12-2007 09:24 AM

Badgers ..... BADGERS! ..... We don't need no stinking BADGERS!

LabRat 11-12-2007 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lumberjim (Post 406094)
i don't think they're badgers at all. I think they're aardvarks.


dontcha mean yardvarks?

ZenGum 11-12-2007 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LabRat (Post 406198)
dontcha mean yardvarks?

:lol:

Vark you.

It's a dolphin, I tells ya.

Cloud 11-12-2007 10:21 AM

they have such strange little tails

Sarasvati48 11-12-2007 12:37 PM

What? No photoshop declarations? It is obiously the same badger, probably setting off some kind of motion flash whilst moving about the yard. The cat probably came in at the last minute, then moved out of frame...That many badgers would have had kitty for dinner...

ViennaWaits 11-12-2007 05:51 PM

Quote:

That's it! send Matt Damon in to take out the Tuberculosis Badgers covertly.
:notworthy Beautiful.

Elspode 11-12-2007 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarasvati48 (Post 406224)
What? No photoshop declarations? It is obiously the same badger, probably setting off some kind of motion flash whilst moving about the yard. The cat probably came in at the last minute, then moved out of frame...That many badgers would have had kitty for dinner...

That would require a multiple exposure, wouldn't it? Can't be that, all the static stuff would be blurred and overexposed, and the moon would been in a slightly different position every time the camera went off.

DucksNuts 11-12-2007 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce (Post 406173)


Yeahh, I got that in UT's post....but I want to know wtf its about? why did they do it...what is it?

I NEED to know, coz the bloody kids wont stop singing it and its in my head now.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:01 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.