Well, it's not that. It's just that most of us know not to take Ann seriously. Then again, most of us are not angry youth who swallow up everything she says (I served with plenty of people who, if she was on the air at the time, would be lapping up her spew and live by it). Unfortunately, the Republican party is bogarted by peeps like them.

I understand that too, but, as you know, Ann is incapable of relating that point eloquently. If she did, she'd be out of a job...

Ann C. is a stupid, rude, cunt and really needs to find a deep, dark cave and stay there until she can "perfect" herself into eternity.

Shel, you rock.

Not because you hate Ann (that's just a plus) but because you are the sort of person who has to feel reeeeaaaalllllyyy strongly about something before you would make a negative comment. Then, when you do, rarely, it's a zinger to beat all zings.

We need more Sheldons in the world, I say! :)

What we really need is a lot less idiocy from the Democratic Party, such as Ann happily documents. If they weren't that -- freaking -- stupid, why Ann would have to do something different in the opinion-column field. I am dissatisfied with the Democrats and so is she. Her opposition is reduced to third-grade-level responses, and they imagine these would count for anything other than an indication of inferior thinking. Sheldon, I'm talking to you, and with your better interest in mind. Reread your post: does it sound like an adult?

Well she sounded pretty stupid to me in that interview, and some would say she's rude. She definitely has a cunt...unless she's the best drag queen ever; and what's wrong with suggesting she goes and finds some place to follow through with what to her must seem like the best thing in the world and the hereafter?

Nope, I think the response was very well thought out Sheldon. Couldn't have said it better myself in fact. ;)

Noted without comment:

A new history of Joseph McCarthy

History has a habit of vindication of the right.

The right has a habit of vindicating me:

?

Perhaps it is disturbing to those whom it is good for the Republic, and for history, if they are disturbed.

So, the book says he did not break the law, breech his authority or encourage others to outcast those who just thought differently than he?
That would be an interesting read.
As ever, acting like them in any way makes us them.

So you think that because someone wrote a biography, the things in it are fact?

I read a biography of Marx once that claimed he was actually a member of a super secret, satanic cult. *smiles* biogs are just biogs.

oooh....super secret satanic cult. so much alliteration....so little time. ;)

You know Karl Marx's grave is a communist plot?

he's not a communist. he's a socialist. There's a big difference is you ask a socialist.

Ok, clever dick joke ruiner:

Did you know Karl Marx's grave is a socialist plot?