![]() |
Quote:
85% out to kill Bush? When at least half the people in the country wouldn't be affected? I don't think we have to worry about civil insurrection. :headshake |
Of course it was exaggeration but the point is Americans won't take it likely. At least the ones affected by it.
|
No, the average American nowadays is as apathetic as a slug, until you pour salt on them.
|
Quote:
|
|
Nice articles, but they certainly are rather biased. Did you read the homepage and the link: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/who.htm
|
I am aware of how bias it is but it gives the opposite side than what we are used to hearing so I thought it would be a nice balance. Here are two more articles by the way.
http://www.informationclearinghouse....ticle15564.htm http://www.informationclearinghouse....ticle13590.htm I thought of something while reading this and I was suprised I didn't think of this earlier. The US and Israel are against a nuclear armed Iran. Iran says it only wants nuclear power, not weapons. We say it is bullshit. To prove this couldn't we offer to help build power plants with other technology? Then Iran wouldn't have an excuse to become nuclear armed and it would help Iran accomplish it's economic goals. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
However, any time you're generating with nuclear power, you will have plutonium getting made. If there's plutonium getting made, and any real progress toward a fuel rod reprocessing capacity, fission weapons are not merely a likely possibility. Even the presence of a plutonium reactor to use the Pu-239 etc for power generation shall not guarantee an absence of fissile nuclear weapons material in stockpile, awaiting the best misuse.
There's a lot of useless, even fatuous, blather about allowing Iran a nuclear power plant but keeping reprocessing and enrichment out of that country. Keeping monopolies is a foredoomed folly -- who the hell accepts a choice between getting our friends or ourselves nuked soon, or nuked some years later? Somebody who really wants to be remembered like Neville Chamberlain, I'd say. The combination of the Ahmedinajad government and nuclear power alarms everyone but Kim Jong Il. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Every news source that mentions the USS Stennis sailing to the Persian Gulf says that it is a warning to Iran, and I doubt that aircraft carriers would be very useful for calming sectarian violence in Iraq. Antiwar.com also has a collection of evidence that we're edging toward a war with Iran. |
Yes, after today I have realized that fact that we, against all logic and common sense, probably will go to war with Iran. If Iran does have those Sunburn missles, we are going to get raped in the Persian Gulf, there is no escape route.
|
|
Iran was always on Bush's hit list; he needs Iran to get that oil pipeline.
I sincerely hope with every fibre of my being, that he is kicked out of office and brought to trial for war crimes, and that no more British, American and Allied troops, along with thousands of innocent civilians, have to die for this insanity. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:13 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.