![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
|
You say "national gridlock between the President, Congress, and the Supremes" like that would be a bad thing.
IMO, government functions best for me when it's severely hog-tied. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Hi I'm new here- not sure where to go! This seems to be an interesting thread however, so I thought I might jump in! Is there a thread for newbies that I'm missing? As for the topic at hand:
Politics as usual- Just because you have won a battle does not mean you have won a war. Not that I'm completely cynical. I'm pretty sure huge progress could be made from there. Now, let me go back and actually vote. -Already misspelling the obvious. |
Maybe some accountability? Maybe some moderation? Maybe some attention to the scientific and scholarly community rather than just corporations and their sponsored ideological think-tanks. (Not that those wont still be influential, just maybe not the only input.) Maybe some debate about important issues, now a bit more in play, less rubberstamping done deals with the WH.
I think change would be a relief to Bush. Then he can do what he must know needs to be done with/ in/ to Iraq, change course not stay the course, and have options to blame the other side if things get worse, yet still make a claim to leadership if things maintain or even (dare say) improve. It gives him some sympathy room. |
Good point, warch. Gives bush's biographers a scapegoat, when they are trying to argue he's not the worst President in history. :litebulb:
|
Quote:
|
Most things will get better.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
See, I win my bet. |
Boogey-Man Politics...
I'll bet that's the answer. |
Quote:
|
No, but the evil Liberal Overlords that "pull the strings" from "behind the scenes" are waiting to STRIKE!!!1!!1!1!
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:08 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.