The Cellar

The Cellar (http://cellar.org/index.php)
-   Current Events (http://cellar.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Bush's Shrinking Safety Zone (http://cellar.org/showthread.php?t=9631)

lookout123 11-14-2007 02:52 PM

[quote][Lookout123 approves of this./QUOTE]

cite?

tw 11-14-2007 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lookout123 (Post 407054)
cite?

here
When junior learns respect, then lookout123 can ask permission to speak.

lookout123 11-14-2007 11:17 PM

so from that post you get that i approve of blackwater mercenaries killing people and getting away with it? is that what you are saying?

Urbane Guerrilla 11-17-2007 10:55 PM

Tw getting somebody's ideas wrongly fixed is the usual road, yes.

He's a lot better at troubleshooting autos than at the people arts, like politics.

richlevy 11-18-2007 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla (Post 408144)
Tw getting somebody's ideas wrongly fixed is the usual road, yes.

He's a lot better at troubleshooting autos than at the people arts, like politics.

..or carpet bombing.

tw 11-18-2007 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by richlevy (Post 408214)
..or carpet bombing.

Yeph. Agent Orange killed that flea. Problem solved. Cheney would be proud of me. And now everyone asks where I bought the new carpet.

tw 12-07-2007 08:19 PM

From the BBC of 8 Dec 2007:
Quote:

UK Guantanamo four to be released
Four of the five British residents held by the US at Guantanamo Bay are to be released, the BBC has learned. ...
The Americans accuse Mr el-Banna of being a prominent al-Qaeda recruiter and financier, Libyan Mr Deghayes of associating with al-Qaeda, and Algerian Mr Sameur of receiving combat training in Afghanistan.
Suddenly they are no longer dangerous? By torturing them with the words from god as told to George Jr, then these evil men have been repatriated? After spending years in prison without judicial review or writ of Habeas Corpus, then suddenly these four men are no longer part of an "international world wide organized evil empire of terror"? Wow. Maybe the Nazis had to right all along. Torture does work.

Did George Jr also convert the bogeyman after only asking questions in a secret underground White House prison chamber? Suddenly UG and classicman no longer have an enemy to blame for everything? What will they do?

A secretly released CIA tape proves that Hitler's bastard son, living in South America, has been secretly supplying Al Qaeda with weapons. Now we can 'Pearl Harbor' Brazil. That will make Urbane Guerrilla so happy. Guantanamo is conveniently placed to make this work. It's good to know how Guantanamo can reform terrorists. Even the most evil terrorists with stiff upper lips.

TheMercenary 12-07-2007 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lookout123 (Post 407249)
so from that post you get that i approve of blackwater mercenaries killing people and getting away with it? is that what you are saying?

From now on when you see TW post think Ted Kaczynski with internet access:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/graphic...ots/tedmug.jpg

classicman 12-08-2007 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw (Post 414379)
Suddenly UG and classicman no longer have an enemy to blame for everything? What will they do?

How and why did I get dragged into this?

tw, seriously, leave me out of your petty squabbles.

ktxbye

tw 12-11-2007 09:38 PM

I'm so pleased the George Jr administration is protecting Americans - a specific reference to the type of people Urbane Guerrilla so approves of and a government that would even deny this happened. Since "Saddam has WMDs", then what's wrong with a few more lies. From ABC News of 10 Dec 2007 is a question of how often does Haliburton work for the greater glory of America. As made obvious from George Jr administration actions, this is all good for America:
Quote:

Gang-Rape Cover-Up by U.S., Halliburton/KBR
A Houston, Texas woman says she was gang-raped by Halliburton/KBR coworkers in Baghdad, and the company and the U.S. government are covering up the incident....

"I said, 'Dad, I've been raped. I don't know what to do. I'm in this container, and I'm not able to leave,'" she said. Her father called their congressman, Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas.

"We contacted the State Department first," Poe told ABCNews.com, "and told them of the urgency of rescuing an American citizen" -- from her American employer.

Poe says his office contacted the State Department, which quickly dispatched agents from the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad to Jones' camp, where they rescued her from the container.

According to her lawsuit, Jones was raped by "several attackers who first drugged her, then repeatedly raped and injured her, both physically and emotionally."

Jones told ABCNews.com that an examination by Army doctors showed she had been raped "both vaginally and anally," but that the rape kit disappeared after it was handed over to KBR security officers. ...

Over two years later, the Justice Department has brought no criminal charges in the matter. In fact, ABC News could not confirm any federal agency was investigating the case. ...

Congressman Poe says neither the departments of State nor Justice will give him answers on the status of the Jones investigation. ...

Since no criminal charges have been filed, the only other option, according to Hutson, is the civil system, which is the approach that Jones is trying now. ... Halliburton won more than 80 percent of arbitration proceedings brought against it.
Why should they investigate. Haliburton employees in Iraq are exempt from all laws.

Her rescuers found her in a locked shipping container. Her medical exam says she was clearly raped. The evidence was lost by Haliburton - that so patriotic organization. EVen a Republican Congressman says it happened. Two years later means no criminal investigation? Begs anyone who supports the scumbag president to question his own morality. But it won't. Even questions by a Congressman means no investigation. Campaign contributions do buy protection.

Amazing how only the evil news services would report such facts. The coverup continues. Read it.
Quote:

KBR said it was "instructed to cease" its own investigation by U.S. government authorities "because they were assuming sole responsibility for the criminal investigations."

classicman 12-11-2007 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the article (Post 415550)
Jones told ABCNews.com that an examination by Army doctors showed she had been raped "both vaginally and anally," but that the rape kit disappeared after it was handed over to KBR security officers. ...

What???? Why would they give the rape kit to the accused? Somethin fishy with that story.

P.S. - tw, see how I quoted the article to eliminate any confusion?

tw 12-12-2007 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 415566)
What???? Why would they give the rape kit to the accused? Somethin fishy with that story.

You are making assumptions. Again making conclusions based upon what does not exist. The rape kit was not handed to the accused. KBR (Halliburton) was not accused.
Quote:

... was handed over to KBR security officers
KBR are the patriots who work for America. These were security men. Therefore they could be trusted to promote the George Jr agenda.

Halliburton (KBR) accused of violating American laws? No problem. KBR is exempt from any laws in Iraq. Even the Iraqi government cannot prosecute any KBR employee in their country.

classicman 12-13-2007 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by article
"Texas woman says she was gang-raped by Halliburton/KBR coworkers in Baghdad, and the company and the U.S. government are covering up the incident...." ~snip~ ... an examination by Army doctors showed she had been raped "both vaginally and anally," but that the rape kit disappeared after it was handed over to KBR security officers...:eyebrow:

Sorry still doesn't make sense.:headshake

Ibby 12-13-2007 07:59 AM

pssssst - tw was being sarcastic

classicman 12-13-2007 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ibram (Post 416016)
pssssst - tw was being sarcastic

psst - so was my response.

Bt the question I posed remains to be answered, doesn't it?

tw 12-13-2007 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 416043)
Bt the question I posed remains to be answered, doesn't it?

You really must learn to read with care. Why do you see a "question" when even a question mark does not exist? What question? Maybe I should requote it for you? Naw. That would only create more questions without question marks. The world is confusing enough. [And who is Bt?]

classicman 12-13-2007 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classicman (Post 415566)
What? Why would they give the rape kit to the accused?

That one perhaps. actually its those two.

tw 02-13-2008 01:18 AM

China made the problem so obvious that everyone, even in the Cellar, would see it. A Chinese intentional destruction of a satellite means the number of dangerous space junk tracked by the US increased to over 6000+ items. 2000+ were created by that Chinese demonstration. Numbers intentionally created to make it impossible for anyone (except extremists) to justify the mental midget's denials.

Responsible nations desperately want restrictions so that this problem does not worsen. Only one nation (under extremist god) is stifling this effort. President Cheney would rather solve everything using pre-emption. America needs space for more battlefields.

From the NY Times of 13 Feb 2008:
Quote:

U.N. Weighs a Ban on Weapons in Space, but U.S. Still Objects
The Russian foreign minister, Sergey V. Lavrov, on Tuesday presented a Russian-Chinese draft treaty banning weapons in space to the United Nations Conference on Disarmament, an idea that was quickly rejected by the United States.

Russia and China have pushed for years for a treaty to prevent an arms race in space, a threat underlined by China last year after it shot down one of its own aging satellites.

Responding to previous American assertions that there is no arms race in space and therefore no need for a treaty,
Show me one thing from the mental midget that indicates intelligence.
Quote:

The White House responded to the proposal on Tuesday afternoon, saying it opposed any treaty that sought "to prohibit or limit access to or use of space."
Oh. George Jr will find bin Laden in space? Even Nixon was not this anti-American, anti-Australian, anti-Thai, anti-German, anti-Tanzanian, anti-Brazilian ...

See also USA pwnz space..

classicman 02-13-2008 07:29 AM

What does that have to do with giving the rape kit to the company/employer of the accused rapists?

That simply makes no sense.

tw 03-18-2008 08:15 PM

From the NY Times of 19 Mar 2008:
Quote:

Bush Says Iraq War Was Worth It
President Bush says he has no doubts about launching the unpopular war in Iraq despite the ''high cost in lives and treasure,'' arguing that retreat now would embolden Iran and provide al-Qaida with money for weapons of mass destruction to attack the United States.

Bush is to mark the fifth anniversary of the US-led invasion of Iraq on Wednesday with a speech at the Pentagon. Excerpts of his address were released Tuesday night by the White House.

At least 3,990 members of the U.S. military have died since the beginning of the war in 2003. It has cost taxpayers about $500 billion and estimates of the final tab run far higher. Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph E. Stiglizt and Harvard University public finance expert Linda Bilmes have estimated the eventual cost at $3 trillion when all the expenses, including long-term care for veterans, are calculated.
Meanwhile neither Iran, Iraq, or N Korea was a threat. A wacko extremist has a political agenda to serve. Honesty is not George Jr - a problem when told what to do by god. All those 'axis of evil', it turns out, were not until George Jr began threatening them with 'Pearl Harbor' actions justified by a crusader's mentality. Guess who pays.

Curiously, this was also the 40th Anniversary of the My Lai massacre where American soldiers even used babies for target practice. All for the glory of another lying president.

tw 04-02-2008 12:50 AM

From the Washington Post of 2 Apr 2008:
Quote:

Memo: Laws Didn't Apply to Interrogators
Justice Dept. Official in 2003 Said President's Wartime Authority Trumped Many Statutes

The Justice Department sent a legal memorandum to the Pentagon in 2003 asserting that federal laws prohibiting assault, maiming and other crimes did not apply to military interrogators who questioned al-Qaeda captives because the president's ultimate authority as commander in chief overrode such statutes.
Torture and international kidnapping of any non-American was declared legal by our wacko extremists. Another example of how corrupt one will be when a political agenda justifies action. Another example of why extremists are so dangerous since only an extremist would see nothing wrong here.

"It was legal. Therefore it is not 'evil'."

classicman 04-02-2008 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw (Post 443140)
Another example .... since only an extremist would see nothing wrong here.

Where?
:eyebrow:

spudcon 04-25-2008 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw (Post 439791)
From the NY Times of 19 Mar 2008: Meanwhile neither Iran, Iraq, or N Korea was a threat. A wacko extremist has a political agenda to serve. Honesty is not George Jr - a problem when told what to do by god. All those 'axis of evil', it turns out, were not until George Jr began threatening them with 'Pearl Harbor' actions justified by a crusader's mentality. Guess who pays.

Curiously, this was also the 40th Anniversary of the My Lai massacre where American soldiers even used babies for target practice. All for the glory of another lying president.

Which lying president would that be?

classicman 04-25-2008 06:29 PM

Answer from wiki

Quote:

During 1968 there were many questions about the presidency. On March 31, 1968 in a decision that stunned political friends and many others, President Lyndon B. Johnson announced that he would not seek, nor would he accept the nomination of his party for president. Johnson said he was withdrawing in the name of national unity. This sparked many questions throughout the nation. People wondered who would become the next president of the United States. Their questions were answered very soon. In August of 1968, Richard Nixon, the "old pro" of the Republican Party, was nominated for president. On November 6, 1968 Richard M. Nixon was elected President of the United States.

tw 04-25-2008 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spudcon (Post 448393)
Which lying president would that be?

From ABC News of 19 April 2008:
Quote:

No Al Qaeda Policy: Congress Wants Answers
Congress plans to press the Bush administration aggressively to justify its policy in Afghanistan following a nonpartisan report that concludes that the administration "lacks a comprehensive plan" to take on al Qaeda in its stronghold. ...

Berman has scheduled a hearing for May 7 to grill administration officials.

His concern follows a report by the Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress, that concludes, "No comprehensive plan for meeting U.S. national security goals ... has been developed" in Pakistan's lawless tribal region along the Afghan border.
Such a plan requires a White House that works for America; not for a political agenda. These are mutually exclusive objectives.

There is not and has not been plans to get bin Laden. Those who have long understood this also ask, "When do we go after bin Laden?" Now the GAO says same.
Quote:

The Bush administration does not have such a plan, even though it was called for by the 9/11 Commission and was mandated under a 2007 law, the GAO report said.

The report pulls no punches. It concludes that six years after President Bush pledged to take Osama bin Laden "dead or alive," al Qaeda has "regenerated its ability to attack the United States and had succeeded in establishing a safe haven" in Pakistan's border region.
Is the GAO some kind of communist conspiracy? Only useful plans to end "Mission Accomplished" also came from the 9/11 Commission. But when the president is even a liar, then keeping a bogeyman alive is good politics.

Which is good for America? A political agenda or getting bin Laden? Keeping bin Laden alive is good for wacko extremist politics. But the patriot asks, "When do we go after bin Laden?" GAO has finally moved Congress to work for America? How many Cellar Dwellers also feared to ask what only a patriotic Congressman (or presidential candidate) would ask. When DO we go after bin Laden? A lying president will not.

spudcon 04-26-2008 10:18 AM

Let me help. The lying president wasn't named Bush or Nixon. My Lai occurred March 16, 1968.
Old lying liberal Democrat LBJ was the lying president during My Lai. How many thousands of civilians and US military died because of his lies and micromanagement? GWB has no chance of finishing up his eight years in office cathing up to LBJ's five years of criminal activity.

Griff 04-26-2008 10:31 AM

1 Attachment(s)
We've had lots of liars. LBJ is right there with Wilson and Bush in shear criminality.

spudcon 04-26-2008 06:23 PM

Can you attempt to adjust for inflation?

xoxoxoBruce 04-26-2008 07:14 PM

It says, in 2007 dollars.

Happy Monkey 04-27-2008 12:40 PM

$4 billion in 1776 dollars would have been impressive.

richlevy 04-27-2008 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Griff (Post 448559)
We've had lots of liars. LBJ is right there with Wilson and Bush in shear criminality.

Looking at the chart WWI, WWII, and the Korean War were not 'US' Wars. Technically, Afghanistan-Iraq also are not, but with over %90 of the forces involved and probably an even larger percentage of the cost tied to the US, it really is a US-led show.

Was the $3.2 trillion for WWII all from the US?

BTW, the 820 billion for Iraq/Afghanistan only includes current costs, and even then not those buried in defense spending. I'm not sure I trust the $3 trillion figure being thrown around, but I would at least double the 820B if including post-war costs even if the war were called off tomorrow.

In terms of bang for the buck, Iraq will go down in history as the worst strategic blunder the US has ever made.

Griff 04-27-2008 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by richlevy (Post 448873)
Was the $3.2 trillion for WWII all from the US?

That is the impression I get from the labeling. The article in Reason it comes from is about the cost of our present war so they would want to minimize the WW2 numbers.

Undertoad 04-27-2008 06:33 PM

Percentage of GDP would show actual impact on the people and the economy.

Undertoad 04-27-2008 07:40 PM

Using this set of GDP data, and a Sharpie on the back of a wet napkin:

Iraq 2: 1.1% of GDP
Iraq 1: 1.2%
Vietnam: 2%
WW2: 56%
WW1: 16%
Span-Amer: 2%
Civil War: 22%

Beyond that I doubt the numbers are meaningful.

Well yeah, it's 1.1% that could surely have been spent more wisely.

This does indicate the difference between "war" and "total war" ala WW2 in which the fight is thought to be for one's very existence as a nation, as a culture. Pretty much the whole banana is avoiding one of those kinds of wars. Whatever we could do to avoid that would be great.

tw 04-27-2008 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Undertoad (Post 448943)
Using this set of GDP data, and a Sharpie on the back of a wet napkin:
Iraq 2: 1.1% of GDP
Iraq 1: 1.2%
Vietnam: 2% ...

Iraq 1 (Desert Storm or Kuwait Liberation) does not tell the entire picture. Because the president back then was more responsible, then the US paid almost nothing for that war. That war was paid for mostly by the entire world. Japan being the largest contributor. Therefore the negative effects on the economy from that war were marginal at best (and yet still the economy took a small downturn).

tw 04-30-2008 11:46 PM

White House admits fault on 'Mission Accomplished' banner
 
From ABC News of 30 April 2008:
Quote:

White House admits fault on 'Mission Accomplished' banner
"Major combat operations in Iraq have ended," Bush said at the time. "The battle of Iraq is one victory in a war on terror that began on Sept. 11, 2001, and still goes on." The "Mission Accomplished" banner was prominently displayed above him - a move the White House came to regret as the display was mocked and became a source of controversy. ...

Now in its sixth year, the war in Iraq has claimed the lives of at least 4,061 members of the U.S. military. Only the Vietnam War (August 1964 to January 1973), the war in Afghanistan (October 2001 to present) and the Revolutionary War (July 1776 to April 1783) have engaged America longer.
3.5 years to create, train, and deply armies all over the world and win every war. Six years and George Jr cannot even conquer one innocet nation? Meanwhile, when do we go after bin Laden? Mission Accomplished. Protect the bogeyman.

classicman 05-01-2008 04:41 PM

psssst - BOO

xoxoxoBruce 05-01-2008 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw (Post 450025)
Meanwhile, when do we go after bin Laden?

When we decide to declare war on Pakistan.

tw 05-02-2008 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce (Post 450388)
When we decide to declare war on Pakistan.

We don't need a war to conduct covert operations. But then all efforts to get bin Laden including tracking him, military surveillance, Alex Station, or future intentions – all have been canceled or obstructed by George Jr.

xoxoxoBruce 05-02-2008 11:01 PM

It would be impossible to conduct a covert operation in North-West Frontier Provence.

tw 05-03-2008 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce (Post 450681)
It would be impossible to conduct a covert operation in North-West Frontier Provence.

Just like it was impossible to do in Afghanistan? Spies can be dispatched almost anywhere - as we had in Afghanistan. Intelligence units (ie Alex Station) would have always existed if we had any intent to go after bin Laden.

xoxoxoBruce 05-04-2008 12:49 AM

The North-West Frontier Provence is a whole different ballgame. A goat can't move without being scrutinized. Rambo would be killed, there.

tw 05-04-2008 01:42 AM

KBR is George Jr's choice for no-bid contracts. KBR properly reflects the attitude and knowledge of our leader. From the NY Times of 4 May 2008:
Quote:

Despite Alert, Flawed Wiring Still Kills G.I.'s
... the Army bulletin said that five deaths over the preceding year had apparently been caused by faulty grounding, and the circumstances of others have not been fully explained by the Army. Many more soldiers have been injured by shocks, Pentagon officials and soldiers say.
Tens of thousands of grounds must be missing just to have one result in severe electric shock. Electrical grounds are so obvious and easy that it is almost impossible for any honest person to not connect one. Why do so many Americans still get killed? Good thing we saved so much money and therefore don't have all these debts to pay off.
Quote:

American electricians who worked for KBR ... said they repeatedly warned company managers and military officials about unsafe electrical work, which was often performed by poorly trained Iraqis and Afghans paid just a few dollars a day. ...

KBR itself told the Pentagon in early 2007 about unsafe electrical wiring at a base near the Baghdad airport, but no repairs were made. Less than a year later, a soldier was electrocuted in a shower there. ...

Lawmakers and government investigators say it is now clear that the Bush administration outsourced so much work to KBR and other contractors in Iraq that the agencies charged with oversight have been overwhelmed. The Defense Contracting Management Agency has more than 9,000 employees, but it has only 60 contract officers in Iraq and 30 in Afghanistan to supervise nearly 18,000 KBR employees in Iraq and 4,400 in Afghanistan handling base maintenance.

"All the contract officers can do is check the paperwork," ...

Staff Sgt. Christopher L. Everett, 23, of the Texas National Guard was electrocuted in September 2005 while power-washing a Humvee at Camp Taqaddum, in central Iraq near Falluja. ...

The most recent fatality occurred on Jan. 2 in Baghdad, when Staff Sgt. Ryan D. Maseth, a Green Beret, died in a shower after an improperly grounded water pump short-circuited.

Nearly a year earlier, KBR issued a technical report to the contracting agency citing safety concerns related to the grounding and wiring in the building in the Radwaniyah Palace Complex, where Sergeant Maseth's unit, the Army Fifth Special Forces Group, was housed.

Another soldier said in an interview that he was repeatedly shocked in the shower in December 2007 and submitted requests for repairs. But nothing was done until the day after Sergeant Maseth's death, when the defense agency ordered KBR to correct the problem, according to Pentagon documents.
They are only soldiers - expendable? So lie to mask reality?
Quote:

Cheryl Harris, Sergeant Maseth's mother, said in an interview that the Army initially told her that her son had taken an electrical appliance into the shower with him. Later, she said, officials told her that investigators had found electrical wires hanging down around the shower. She said she had been skeptical of both accounts and learned the truth only after repeatedly questioning Army officials. ...

"I knew Ryan would not get into a shower with an electrical appliance, and having wires hanging overhead didn't make sense," said Ms. Harris, of Cranberry Township, Pa. "My biggest question is really, why would KBR do a safety inspection, know about the electrical problems and not alert the troops?" ...

In 2006, John McLain was working as a KBR electrician at the United States regional embassy compound in Hilla, south of Baghdad, when he made a disturbing discovery. A KBR quality control inspector had recently cited employees there for failing to file quarterly ground resistance testing logs - reports on whether the wiring in the upgraded embassy building was properly grounded and safe.

Mr. McLain soon realized that the testing was not being conducted, because the building had never been grounded, though KBR and at least one Iraqi subcontractor were supposed to install proper safeguards during a renovation the previous year. Mr. McLain said he had sent a series of increasingly blunt memos and e-mail warnings about the safety hazards to KBR officials.

Mr. McLain said other KBR electricians later created logs that incorrectly made it appear that the grounding system existed. KBR fired him in 2007 after he told a visiting defense contracting agency official about his concerns. His candor proved useless, however. Mr. McLain said that the contracting agency official showed no interest. "He said, I'm not an electrician; I don't know what you are talking about," Mr. McLain recalled.

Noris Rogers, who worked for KBR in Afghanistan in 2005, said he repeatedly complained to his supervisors that electrical work at Camp Eggers, the American military's command base in Kabul, Afghanistan, did not meet the requirements of the company's Pentagon contract.

Mr. Bliss, who saw a soldier in Qalat, Afghanistan, get a severe shock from an electrical box that was not supposed to be charged, said his KBR bosses mocked him for raising safety issues.
Safety grounding is so easy, so obvious, so standard, so simply, and so difficult to get wrong .,. So why does grounding not get done? It’s easier to not do it - but only when top bosses hold nobody responsible or are also on the take. Why does George Jr so often reward KBR - Cheney's company - with so many no-bid contracts?

Undertoad 05-04-2008 08:55 AM

Cheney's "company" is Halliburton. Last year Halliburton sold off KBR, and is now only an oil services company and not an oil and international construction services company.

xoxoxoBruce 05-04-2008 04:02 PM

But wasn't KBR awarded this work while still in the Halliburton (Cheney) family?

richlevy 05-04-2008 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Undertoad (Post 450865)
Cheney's "company" is Halliburton. Last year Halliburton sold off KBR, and is now only an oil services company and not an oil and international construction services company.

And the shareholders rejoiced mightily at the windfall, which, thanks to the Bush Administration, were taxed lightly.

Cheney should have recused himself from any decisions involving Haliburton/KBR. It should have been left to the Pentagon.

tw 05-09-2008 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tw (Post 394526)
Estimates now put "Mission Accomplished" at another 10 years. Even the most optimistic numbers are another 6 years. Less only if Americans wake up to the realities. We didn't in Nam because we let wacko extremist propaganda create fear - those mythical Dominos. We even invaded Cambodia and made that country unstable. How long before our wackos call for attacks on Iran or Syria?

A long list of top Generals from Iraq (10+ now?), retired, and now publically blame the mental midget administration. No way around these realities. He is making messes well beyond Iraq - ... Things are that bad.

The Marines may have found a way to get out of an unwinnable conflict. They are asking to be deployed only to Afghanistan. Remember that other war where Goerge Jr / Cheney et al all but protect bin Laden? So when are we going after bin Laden? Well at least the Marines will not be fighting where they cannot win.

From the Washington Post of 9 May 2008:
Quote:

Pentagon Is Open to Moving More Marines to Afghanistan
The Marine Corps may begin shifting its major combat forces out of Iraq to focus on Afghanistan in 2009 if greater security in Iraq allows a reduction of Marines there, top Pentagon officials said yesterday.

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and Adm. Michael G. Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that the proposal by the Marine Corps commandant, Gen. James Conway, to focus his force on Afghanistan -- which they rejected late last year -- could be reconsidered.

Urbane Guerrilla 05-16-2008 11:08 PM

The evidence remains against any interpretation that the dominoes were "mythical." China: first domino. North Vietnam: second domino. Then in very rapid succession, Laos, Cambodia, South Vietnam. Four or five dominoes (which word tw cannot spell) is validation of the domino worry: that SE Asia would fall into Communism's dark night and human wastage. Which it indeed did. For which occurrences, tw is the endless shill, while denying he's doing any such thing. He's never been able to explain how the domino theory is unjustified anyway. It suffices for him to pretend aloud that it was, but I have a clearer, better mind, and much better morals. I actually dislike dictatorships.

If there's ever a leftist totalitarian regime tw can't love, I don't know which one it is. I've thought the same of the late columnist Mary McGrory, and disapproved of her every bit as much because of it.

It's more tw's ideas that are under attack nowadays than his personality.

deadbeater 05-23-2008 06:01 PM

guerilla, the so called dominoes fell because the US invaded their countries as well, for what turned out to be no reason at all. Those countries got so pissed at this new attempt at imperialism from the West, they threw themselves on the (Chinese/Vietnamese) Communists' side.

Only for the USSR, the 'dominoes' became dominant in themselves, and didn't care much for Russian-brand Communism.

Iran learned very well from 'Nam. Notice how they helped the Coalition in Afghanistan by shutting out the Taliban' potential escape there; but have their cronies fight the Coalition in Iraq after Saddam fell. They realize first that it is in their interest to rid themselves of Hussein and Omar as neighbors. They then extended the war because they realized that Bush/Cheyney was looking at a reason to invade Iran from 2003 on. 'Have the brothers fight over there on enemies' turf, as opposed to having the brothers fight on our turf.' Somebody said that, someone famous...

tw 05-24-2008 07:16 PM

UG also forgets that under that same 'evil' government, Vietnam is now prospering as never seen before. GDP growth is puts Vietnam as one of the fastest growing nations in Asia. Another trend is so many former boat people who visit their former homeland and end up staying. Job prospects and a future are that rosy in communist Vietnam. Domino simply fell in the right direction.

Urbane Guerrilla 06-01-2008 01:21 AM

Tw's ever the apologist for the Communists, which is simply an indication of his amputee's grasp of the real or that which humans desire. Totalitarian government cannot help but be evil; tw never understands this because he's so incompetent both at good and evil and at the human arts of politics. He hitched his wagon to a Red Star, and can't unhitch. Very inflexible mind.

The reason Vietnam is working now is because the Vietnamese have abandoned communism, not because the Communists seized it and generated two million international refugees and two hundred fifty thousand surviving boat people. People try and float away from communist totalitarianism on rafts, tw -- never towards it. Boat people validate our entire effort, and indict those whom you love so crazily and unbelievably. I can only assume your motivations are either insane or nonhuman. I will have none of them, and am offended you still advocate such abominations.

Having abandoned communism, Vietnam prospers in spite of the cadre's maintenance of Communism as the state religion. Vietnam will be in better shape when it abandons the bad religion at all levels.

Urbane Guerrilla 06-01-2008 01:26 AM

Deadbeater, Laos is still communist, and still totally screwed up. American bombing of communists in Cambodia, communists in Laos, and communists in South Vietnam did not collapse these nations, only the invasion by totalitarians did. No totalitarian invasion, no falls -- that follows. After invasions by totalitarians, falls into ruin, everywhere I've mentioned. Those nations that have abandoned communism now prosper again. They didn't while the Communists practiced communism upon the population. These things are matters of record, deadbeater, which records you're not reading. Why is that? I can imagine, but it's very much not to your credit.

Urbane Guerrilla 06-01-2008 01:29 AM

Summary of Bush's actual record -- and of who'd rather it were otherwise.

headsplice 06-03-2008 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla (Post 458471)
Summary of Bush's actual record -- and of who'd rather it were otherwise.

World Net Daily? I call shenanigans...

xoxoxoBruce 06-03-2008 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla (Post 458470)
American bombing of communists in Cambodia, communists in Laos, and communists in South Vietnam did not collapse these nations, only the invasion by totalitarians did. No totalitarian invasion, no falls -- that follows. After invasions by totalitarians, falls into ruin, everywhere I've mentioned. Those nations that have abandoned communism now prosper again.

More proof we can't force it on them, the people have to want it.

headsplice 06-04-2008 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla (Post 458470)
Deadbeater, Laos is still communist, and still totally screwed up. American bombing of communists in Cambodia, communists in Laos, and communists in South Vietnam did not collapse these nations, only the invasion by totalitarians did. No totalitarian invasion, no falls -- that follows. After invasions by totalitarians, falls into ruin, everywhere I've mentioned. Those nations that have abandoned communism now prosper again. They didn't while the Communists practiced communism upon the population. These things are matters of record, deadbeater, which records you're not reading. Why is that? I can imagine, but it's very much not to your credit.

Except, you know, China.

TheMercenary 06-04-2008 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by headsplice (Post 459464)
Except, you know, China.

Last time anyone checked the communist party was alive and well in China.

headsplice 06-05-2008 11:42 AM

Yup. That was, in fact, the point.

deadbeater 06-06-2008 07:46 PM

The stock market crashed today on bad news that can't be hidden by the government anymore. The market crashed, and, as the oil running up $11 dollars per barrel, we will soon have rises in unemployment and inflation. Way to go, Bush.

TheMercenary 06-06-2008 08:12 PM

This started long before Bush, he just hastened it.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.