![]() |
I would say it is sensationalizing a few bad apples at the top. Their rot did not always trickle down. Only one department has had formal complaints, there are some others under investigation. So far no one has been charged. Most of the problems were in the Civil Rights Divsion as you point out or with the political appointment of Gonzales. The rest are speculative or under investigation. Don't accuse the whole department because of a few bad actors.
|
Quote:
Most wont be charge with a crime because their acts were not criminal. For the most part, with the exception of Gonzales' alleged perjury, they were violations of administrative law and department policies and procedures that results in firing. Most resigned before they could be fired. Others may face disbarment. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
but I have to laugh at how you guys keep finding a way to excuse the actions of the Bush administration. |
Speaking of the Justice Department....
From here Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Whatever happened to Monica Goodling? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
She was a top deputy to Ashcroft when he was AG and was the one who reportedly ordered drapes to be placed over the partially nude statue of the Spirit of Justice in the Justice Department's Great Hall where he would hold press conferences. The press would takes pics from an angle to show Ashcroft right below her breasts or so they were accused by Monica of doing it deliberately to embarrass stuffy old Ashcroft. http://www.zpub.com/un/statue300ap.jpg And then this came out after she had the statue covered.."I hide you, babe" http://polisat.com/ashcroft/ihideyoubabe.html In some ways, the "cover up" was very symbolic of the Bush DoJ. |
I think John was just worried that people would be distracted trying to figure out which one was the bigger boob.;)
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I will give him props for having limits when noone else did. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Redux, that's because it's so hard to find adult thought among the common run of the Democrats. Once you've totted up Joe Lieberman, then who? It gets thin after that.
The stimulus is nothing other than a borrowing to cover the damage of bad borrowing, is it not? That's the overarching grounds for criticizing the stimulus bill. Doesn't sound like something to repose confidence in to me, yet remarkably large numbers of Democratic congresscritters are alllllllll for it. Somebody is NOT PAYING ATTENTION to the federal deficit, and that is the thing that debases the currency. But who's stopping the debasement of the currency? |
Quote:
And I was impressed with Fiengold's record, during the last 8 years of fucked up lawmaking. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:27 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.