| ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
xoxoxoBruce Wednesday Jul 9 12:50 AM |
July 9, 2008: Constellation Program You've probably heard NASA is winding down the shuttle program, and leaving it to the Russians to support the International Space Station. stevecrm Wednesday Jul 9 02:28 AM If there is no gravity on the moon, how would these vehicles stay on the ground? morethanpretty Wednesday Jul 9 02:32 AM There is gravity on any mass, just the greater the mass, greater the gravity. right? rupip Wednesday Jul 9 02:39 AM there is gravity on the moon - but just 1/6th of the gravity we have to deal with on earth. SPUCK Wednesday Jul 9 05:46 AM Same amount of inertia though.. glatt Wednesday Jul 9 09:08 AM It would be a lot more reliable and cheaper if they just rode mountain bikes. tombstone Wednesday Jul 9 10:42 AM For that last picture, in my mind's eye, I can just see the astronaut leaping up to the door.... SteveDallas Wednesday Jul 9 11:04 AMWhy don't they just send a Segway and be done with it? Diaphone Jim Wednesday Jul 9 12:11 PM I like the bottom ones. They look like mobile outhouses: they come to you when you gotta go. Clodfobble Wednesday Jul 9 03:34 PM There is zero ground clearance on the second one, how can it possibly go over any sort of planet surface? Griff Wednesday Jul 9 03:45 PM Clod it looks like there's a pivot for a hydralic lift on the second one. The Segway is an apt comparison though. All these look like a triumph of advertising over common sense. glatt Wednesday Jul 9 03:53 PM Surely they wouldn't fill those tires with air for the final design that goes to the moon? Pop! Pop! Pop! Pop! Pop! Pop! el fantastico Wednesday Jul 9 03:56 PM since nasa already chopped and dropped their whips, they need to add thumpin systems to go with the hydraulics. "then i let the alpine play..." Griff Wednesday Jul 9 03:57 PM Quote:
spudcon Wednesday Jul 9 04:13 PM Great. Now they're gonna start NASCAR on the moon! footfootfoot Wednesday Jul 9 04:19 PM Quote:
Griff Wednesday Jul 9 04:26 PM Can they do it in the age of high def? monster Wednesday Jul 9 07:17 PM Quote:
Imigo Jones Wednesday Jul 9 11:26 PM http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craters_of_the_Moon_National_Monument Quote:
I never saw that first rover, which may be at JSC, but just so astrotourists aren't 2/3 disappointed on their visit to Houston: The lunar rovers in pics 2 and 3 were tested in the state of Washington: NASA Tests Lunar Robots and Spacesuits on Earthen Moonscape ["Earthen"?] Conditions on the moon will be harsher, but prototype NASA robotic vehicles and their developers braved sand storms and unprecedented temperature swings on sweeping dunes near Moses Lake, Wash. [halfway between Mount Rainier and Idaho], this month to prepare for the future. Student astronaut, distracted by text messaging, "splashed down" into the Sea of Tranquillity. Teams from seven NASA centers and one university coordinated their activities on the Moses Lake Sand Dunes from June 2-13 to gain hands-on experience with specific technical challenges anticipated when humans return to the moon by 2020 and begin to explore the lunar surface and set up initial outposts. While you're on that page, click "Photo Gallery" (under article) or "Gallery: Evaluating Lunar Concepts" (at right; same gallery). Lookit what this other gallery page for the vehicle in pic 2 is called! Live and animated videos. Imigo Jones Wednesday Jul 9 11:29 PM Quote:
I never saw that first rover, which may be at JSC, but just so astrotourists aren't 2/3 disappointed on their visit to Houston: The lunar rovers in pics 2 and 3 were tested in the state of Washington: NASA Tests Lunar Robots and Spacesuits on Earthen Moonscape ["Earthen"?] Conditions on the moon will be harsher, but prototype NASA robotic vehicles and their developers braved sand storms and unprecedented temperature swings on sweeping dunes near Moses Lake, Wash. [halfway between Mount Rainier and Idaho], this month to prepare for the future. Student astronaut, distracted by text messaging, "splashed down" into the Sea of Tranquillity. Teams from seven NASA centers and one university coordinated their activities on the Moses Lake Sand Dunes from June 2-13 to gain hands-on experience with specific technical challenges anticipated when humans return to the moon by 2020 and begin to explore the lunar surface and set up initial outposts. While you're on that page, click "Photo Gallery" (under article) or "Gallery: Evaluating Lunar Concepts" (at right; same gallery). Lookit what this other gallery page for the vehicle in pic 2 is called! Live and animated videos. Sundae Thursday Jul 10 08:32 AM FAIL! Shawnee123 Thursday Jul 10 09:03 AMNooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. Please, no. Imigo Jones Thursday Jul 10 10:22 PM Quote:
". . . the Constellation Program to send human explorers back to the moon, and then onward to Mars and other destinations in the solar system." Why is this program named after a grouping of stars, when the program is staying within the solar system? The launch vehicles (rockets) are named Ares, the Greek name for Mars, which is a planet, fine. The crew vehicle (space capsule, not the SUV) is named Orion, which is a constellation but still has nothing to do with the Moon or the rest of our solar system. Not 1950s sci-fi art but NASA artist's rendering of the lunar lander. The lunar lander is named Altair, which is the name of the biggest star in the constellation Aquila, the eagle. Hey, there's at least a connection with Neil Armstrong's lunar lander, the Eagle. . . . [Later] Oh, I see the lander page explains that. In surfing that quadrant of the NASA site, I saw various lunar rovers called NASA Concept Vehicle (pic 1 in Bruce’s OP), Crew Mobility Chassis Prototype (pic 2), and Crew Exploration Vehicle—blah. To summarize: Here's a mission to the Moon, first, then elsewhere in the solar system. The names currently refer to a type of star grouping, a planet, a particular constellation, a star in a different constellation, and just some working titles. Where's any consistency? NASA should rename everything to focus on the lunar mission. When the time comes, they can name further stuff after Mars and Jupiter, but it doesn't make any sense at any time to go outside the solar system for names for spaceships and such, when there are plenty of great names closer to Earth: Program: the Soleil Moon Frye Program (= solar system in general + Moon in particular + common east Asian pronunciation of "fly") Launch vehicle: the Keith Moon Crew vehicle: the Ban Ki-moon Lunar lander: the Moon Landrieu Crew Exploration Vehicle: the Moon Unit Zappa Constellation Program Office (Johnson Space Center, Houston): Marion Moon Aldrin Domestic Engineering Center
|
| |